Islamic fundamentalism

Misquoting the Shari ‘a, or faithful to Muslim tradition? The attacks by Islamic terrorists on the United States on September 11, 2001 , and those in Bali on October 12, 2002 , have been judged as marking the closure of one era in history and the opening of a new and, perhaps, even more terrible. Father Paul Stenhouse examines some of the background to the ongoing debate about Islam and terrorism.

In the aftermath of the terrorist attacks on New York ’s World Trade Centre, and later claims by Usama bin Laden that suicidal cadres of his Al- Qa’ida (Foundation) movement were indeed responsible, questions naturally arise about the nature of Islamic fundamentalism and its relationship to the Shari’a, or Islamic Law.

Myriad forms

For most of us, awareness of Islam and its myriad religious, political and cultural forms, has been heightened by two factors: the migration of large numbers of Muslims to Western Democracies - often as refugees or foreign workers - and the growing crescendo of violence world-wide in the name of Islam.

This violence snowballed after the founding of the State of Israel in 1948, the fall of the Shah of Iran and the subsequent setting up of the Islamic Republic by the Ayatollah Khomeini in 1979, the invasion of Afghanistan by Russia in 1980 and the war against Iraq in 1991 after Saddam Hussein’s invasion of Kuwait .

Of the seventeen terrorist organisations set up in Islamic States and named by the US State Department in 2000 as actively engaged in terrorism in 1999, eleven are professedly Islamic or are rabidly anti-West and operate through a blend of Marxism and Islam to destabilise their regions or to overthrow their respective governments.

In addition to these high profile radical groups there are many anonymous extremist groups in most Muslim countries devoted to the establishment of Islamic states ruled by the Shari ‘a. The Shari ‘a is not just the Qur’an. As well, it includes the Hadith (sayings of Muhammad), the Ijma’ (consensus of religious experts) and the Qiyas (analogy).

Closest to Europe , Algerian extremists belonging to the Armed Islamic Group (GIA) have been responsible for the deaths of more than 40,000 Algerian civilians - targeting mainly journalists, unveiled women and girls, intellectuals, and anyone it accused of collaborating with the secular government.

The Clinton thesis

In the light of vocal demonstrations of support for the terrorists who attacked the US after September 11 by certain elements within Muslim communities in the Middle East and elsewhere, including Australia , claims by Benezir Bhutto, former Prime Minister of Pakistan that ‘the Muslim faith does not allow the use of violence or terrorism for any cause,’ and assurances by former US President Bill Clinton a few years ago, that ‘even though we have had problems with terrorism coming out of the Middle East , it is not intrinsically related to Islam,’ deserve examining.

Since its foundation in the seventh century, Islam has, with few exceptions, dominated by military force the regions where it has been implanted. The juridical status of non-Muslims living in these countries has not changed since Muhammad’s time: under the Shari ‘a they are not second-class citizens, they are non-persons.

Up until the 1800s it was virtually unheard of for Muslims to live in a non Islamic country of their free will. Apart from exceptional circumstances, they were forbidden to do so. The Qur’an is interpreted as forbidding them to submit themselves to non-Islamic laws; to obey non-Islamic rulers and by implication, to send their children to non-Islamic schools.

Qur’an

Muslim fundamentalists take the Qur’an to be a divine and irrevocable Law revealed by God to Muhammed. It legislates for every aspect of their lives, social, political, cultural and religious.

For fundamentalist Islam, democracy with its secular laws, rulers, judges, courts and associations is an affront. The only rulers and judges with legitimate authority are those whose authority comes from the Shari ‘a.

For fundamentalist Muslims, the Shari ‘a teaches them to fight non- Muslims, while the punishment for those who resist Islam and the Prophet Muhammad is ‘that they should be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned’.

In the Qur’an the Prophet decreed that ‘infidels,’ i.e. Jews and Christians, along with atheists, rationalists, agnostics, humanists and free-thinkers, are to be warred against. He warned Muslims against friendship with non-Muslims, a caution repeated by the Taliban in Afganistan and by fundamentalists world-wide.

Fundamentalist Muslims demand that Muslims who change their religion be killed. They cite Ibn ‘Abbas, the cousin of Muhammad who quoted the latter as decreeing ‘kill him who changes his religion,’ and ‘behead him’. It would be this Shari ‘a law that the Taliban were enforcing against the Christians charged with preaching Christianity, before the US invasion of Afghanistan and the driving underground of the Taliban.

For fundamentalists, the world is divided into those who live in a dar alharb or ‘land of war,’ meaning any country inhabited by non-Muslims who have not yet been subjugated to Islam; and those who live in dar al-Islam or ‘ land of Islam ’ (surrender), by which they mean a country where the precepts of the Shari ‘a are imposed strictly.

Legitimate targets

All Western, free, democratic countries are, in Islamic terms, dur alharb or ‘lands of war’ where fundamentalist Muslims may legitimately, in fact are obliged, to do all they can to bring about the dominance of Islam. Any war-like act against non- Muslims in a dar al-harb is lawful and just.

When the former chief Justice of Iran , Ayatollah Abdul Karim Ardebili, during a Friday Mosque speech in September 1991 called on Muslims to kill Americans, destroy US property and ‘make life bitter for them,’ he was conjuring up demons whose effects were all too evident on September 11, 2001.

Jihad

The major contemporary radical Islamic groups derive their inspiration from the teachings of Said Qutb in Egypt and al-Mawdudi in Pakistan . According to Qutb, a leading figure in the Muslim Brothers, condemned to death for his involvement in a plot to assassinate former Egyptian President Nasser, all polytheists, hypocrites, Jews, Christians, secular rulers, communist states and capitalist systems, have conspired to undermine Islam and are to be resisted.

Both Qutb and al-Mawdudi put Jihad at the forefront of Islamic obligations. In the words of the Ayatollah Khomeini, Jihad ‘means the conquest of all non- Muslim territories. It will be incumbent on every able-bodied adult man to volunteer for this war of conquest whose final goal is the domination of Qur’anic Law from one end of the earth to the other’.

The carnage wreaked in New York and Washington in 2001, and in Bali eleven months later, had all the hallmarks of the work of Mujahidun, or fundamentalist Muslims acting out the jihad.

The conspiracy of silence in the massmedia when fundamentalist Islamic violations of the rights of Muslims and non-Muslim minorities are concerned - the ongoing slaughter of Christians and other non-Muslims by the Laskar Jihad in the Moluccas and the island of Sulawesi in Indonesia , is an example - has done much to convince the likes of Usama bin Laden that their cause is just and that many in the West approve of it.

Atypical Moslems

Fundamentalist Muslims are a vocal minority; they are not typical of the vast majority of Muslims throughout the world. It would greatly help the cause of moderate Islam if its proponents came out courageously and strenuously in condemnation of violence and terror emanating from within their communities. Their credibility would be enhanced if they supported efforts to remove from their religious and legal tradition whatever could be construed as inciting violence against non-Muslims, and if they protested at the violation of the rights of all - be they Muslims or non- Muslims - in Islamic countries.

- This edited article is republished with permission of “The Annals”.


Return to Oriens, Winter, 2003

Return to Oriens home page

eventh century, Islam has, with few exceptions, dominated by military force the regions where it has been implanted.